UK PROSPECTS EVALUATION AFTER BREXIT

Nataliia MIEDVIEDKOVA, Ivan US

Анотація


The key aspects of political plans, conditions, key events and changes for Brexit are considered. The impact of Brexit referendum held in 2016 on how the citizens of Britain and other countries perceive the UK and the EU is researched. Survey results concerning the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union are considered. SWOT analysis on the effect of Brexit on the UK is provided. Primarily the attention is focused on the benefits for the UK such as improved border security and reduction of terrorism, no need to pay an annual fee to the EU treasury. New opportunities for the UK are also defined, namely free choice of policy not restricted by EU conditions, the opportunity to defend the interests of national producers and consumers, preservation of cultural values and traditions. Detailed consideration is given to significant weaknesses for the UK such as re-concluding agreements with each EU member, perceive the UK as a competitor rather than a partner, higher tariffs, finding talented workers, decrease in tax revenues, and the Brexit price. Settlements between the UK and the EU (that forming the Brexit price), as well as the mechanism for calculating UK contributions to the EU budget are analyzed. The main threats are also substantiated, namely uncertainty, unsolved problems with the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland, Scottish reluctance to leave the EU, decrease in trade with EU countries and investment attractiveness. Own interpretation of the prospects for Brexit is suggested.

JEL: F15, F36, F53.


Ключові слова


European Union; Brexit; trade; export; import; Association Agreement; referendum; international trade; SWOT analysis.

Повний текст:

PDF>PDF

Посилання


Babynina L. (2016). Importance of Brexit for the European Union. Contemporary Europe, 4, pp. 21-33. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope420162133

Dhingra S., Ottaviano G., Sampson T. (2015). Britain's future in Europe. London School of Economics, Retrieved from: https://www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/docs/koenig-pamina/brexitwriteup_dhingra.pdf

Elmansy R. (2016). SWOT Analysis for the UK's Brexit Decision to Leave the EU, Retrieved from: https://www.designorate.com/swot-analysis-uks-brexitdecision-to-leave-the-eu/

Hlebnikov I. (2017). BREXIT: Premises, Factors and Prospects. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 19(2), pp. 161-173. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2017-19-2-161-173

Kuryliak M. (2017). Transformation of Ukraine's European Integration Intentions in the Context of Brexit. Herald of Economic Science of Ukraine, 2(33), pp. 70-77. (in Ukrainian)

IPSOS MORI. Political Monitor, Retrieved from: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsosmori/en-uk/political-monitor-archive

Sampson, T., Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Van Reenen, J. (2016). Economists for Brexit: A critique. Paper Brexit06, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, Retrieved from: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit06.pdf

Spivak I. (2016). BREXIT: Current Situation and Expectations. Uzhorod National University Herald. International Economic Relations And World Economy, 19, pp. 141-145. (in Ukrainian)

Statistics on UK-EU trade. (2019). Briefing paper №7851, Retrieved from: http://intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library

Stokes B., Wike R., Manevich D. (2017). Post-Brexit, Europeans More Favorable Toward EU. Pew Research Center, Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/06/15/most-europeans-judgebrexit-as-bad-for-eu-and-uk/

Syskos E., Darvidou K. (2016). The EU growth potential and offsetting Brexit. Is accession of Ukraine a suitable option? Journal of European Economy, 15(4), pp. 386-406. (in Ukrainian)

Van Reenen J. (2016). Brexit's Long-run Effects on the UK Economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. pp. 367-383, Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/brexits-long-runeffects-john-van-reenen.pdf https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2016.0031

Zadoia A., Botsula A. (2017). International integration and disintegration processes: contradictory consequences. Academy Review, 1(46), pp. 5-13. (in Ukrainian)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2020.01.065

Посилання

  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.