PROSPECT THEORY AND TAX COMPLIANCE: A MICROFOUNDED EQUILIBRIUM PERSPECTIVE

Maria Carmela APRILE, Francesco BUSATO, Francesco GIULI, Enrico MARCHETTI

Анотація


This paper discusses the capabilities of a class of microfounded equilibrium models, augmented with Prospect Theory elements in the spirit of al- Nowaihi and Dhami (2007), to address several open questions in the analysis of tax evasion and compliance decisions. There are three main results: i) there exists a unique equilibrium with a tax evasion, consistent with the empirical estimates for the United States economy; ii) the model predicts a positive relationship between tax rate and evasion rate, while offering a solution to the so called Yitzhaki puzzle; iii) the «framing effect» plays a significant role in supporting these results; this is a distinctive characterstic of this class of model, typically not present in simple individual choice models. Furthermore, the model also allows us to investigate some potentially relevant effects of labor supply behavior on the tax compliance decisions.

JEL: E21; D03; D81; H03.


Ключові слова


Tax evasion; fiscal policy; prospect theory.

Повний текст:

PDF>PDF

Посилання


Allingham, M.G., Sandmo, A. 1972. Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 238-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

Alm, J., McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D. 1992. Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., Feinstein, J. 1998. Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818-860.

Arcand, J., Rota Graziosi, G. 2005. Tax Compliance and Rank Dependent Expected Utility. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 30, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-005-1108-1

Barberis, N. Huang, M. 2009.Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 1555-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2009.01.009

Barberis, N. Huang, M., Santos, T. 2001. Prospect Theory and Asset Prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310

Bénassy, J. P., 1999. Analytical solutions to a structural signal extraction model: Lucas 1972 revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics 44, 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00030-6

Bernasconi, M. 1998. Tax evasion and orders of risk aversion. Journal of Public Economics, 67, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00051-0

Bernasconi, M., Zanardi, A. 2004. Tax evasion, tax rates and reference dependence. FinanzArchiv, 60, 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1628/0015221042396122

Ciccarone, G., Marchetti, E. 2013. Rational expectations and loss aversion: potential output and welfare implications. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.032

Cullis, J., Jones, P., Savoia, A., 2012. Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.003

Dhami, S., al-Nowaihi A. 2007. Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64, 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.006

Hashimdaze, N., Myles, G., Tran-Nam, B. 2013. Applications of behavioural economics to tax evasion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 941-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00733.x

Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, American Economic Review, 93, 1449-75. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392

Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D. 1993. Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking. Management Science, 39, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17

Kimball, M., Shapiro, M. 2008. Labor Supply: Are the Income and Substitution Effects Both Large or Small? NBER Working Paper No. 14208. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14208

Lucas, R., 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory 4, 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1

Prelec, D. 1998. The probability weighting function, Econometrica, 60, 497-528. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998573

Rabin, M. 2013. An approach to incorporating psychology into economics. American Economic Review, 103, 617-22. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.617

Rablen, M.D. 2010. A reference-dependent model of tax evasion and exchange equity. Public Finance Review, 38, 282-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110367858

Schneider, F., Enste, D. 2000. Shadow Economies: Size, Causes and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 77-114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.1.77

Schneider, F. Buhen, A. Montenegro, C. 2010. New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world, International. Economic Journal, 24, 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2010.525974

Torgler, B. 2007. Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207203

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. 1992. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574

Yaniv, G. 1999. Tax compliance and advance tax payments: a prospect theory analysis. National Tax Journal, 52, 753-764.

Yitzhaki, S. 1974. A note on income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 201-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90037-1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2019.02.177

Посилання

  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.